6.1 Zrównoważony rozwój miejskich obszarów funkcjonalnych - nr naboru FEPK.06.01-IZ.00-031/26

Typy wnioskodawców

Municipality

Cel

Energia, środowisko, infrastruktura

Znaczenie dla B+R

0 z 3

Polska kwalifikuje się

Tak

Ograniczenie krajów

Poland, Dębica–Ropczyce functional area; applicant limited to the Municipality of Dębica

Region

podkarpackie

Konsorcjum

Niejasne

Poziom gotowości (TRL)

—

Tematy

• Public space renewal
• Urban safety
• Urban regeneration

Ocena maszynowa na podstawie tekstu naboru; warunki sprawdź u źródła. 23 paź 2026

Fakty wyodrębnione z dokumentów źródłowych w przeglądzie danych Scindu. Każda wartość ma własne warunki. Brak danych oznacza, że źródło nie podaje wartości, a nie zero ani brak limitu.

Typ wnioskodawcy

The only applicant named in this noncompetitive intake is Gmina Miasta Dębica.

Ograniczenie wniosku

Applications are accepted from 10 September 2026 through 28 October 2026, 23:59, via WOD2021; the received date is when the application is submitted in WOD2021.

Ograniczenie wniosku

The application must describe the applicant’s management approach for preparation, procurement, technical oversight, financial settlement, acceptance and future infrastructure management; the selection criterion checks experience and whether a project-management description was submitted. These are planning and capacity criteria, not source-mandated project job titles, staffing counts or qualification thresholds.

Zakres projektu

This call is limited to project “Atrakcyjne przestrzenie publiczne Dębicko–Ropczyckiego Obszaru Funkcjonalnego”, type IV physical renewal and safety of public spaces. The stated activity scope includes public-space renewal supporting resident integration or recreation/activity, new green areas, monitoring, and lighting only as part of a wider project.

Inny warunek

The central portal record and current call rules identify the same noncompetitive FEPK.06.01 project call as FEPK.06.01-IZ.00-031/26; the envelope identifier remains the exact current local catalogue value.

Inny warunek

The maximum advance-payment share is 90% of the awarded co-financing amount; this is an advance-payment limit, not a higher grant-intensity rate.

Inny warunek

The regulation says a minimum and maximum total project value are “not applicable,” and maximum eligible expenditure is also “not applicable.” These are not numeric grant caps; the source separately states the PLN 1,000,000 minimum eligible-expenditure floor and the 85% funding maxima.

Inny warunek

The project must submit its final payment request by the end of 2028 Q3. The regulation estimates contract signing by 30 August 2027; this is an estimate, not a minimum/maximum project-duration rule.

Budżet z katalogu

20 543 483 zł

Kwota tak, jak podaje ją instytucja. Czy to cała alokacja, czy limit na projekt, pozostaje niezweryfikowane, chyba że mówi o tym przejrzany warunek.

Alokacja naboru

20 543 483 zł

Allocation stated for this noncompetitive call. This is the call allocation and is not restated as a separate numeric maximum grant per project; the regulation notes that the contractable amount can depend on the monthly EUR exchange-rate/allocation algorithm and that the allocation may be changed.

Koszt kwalifikowalny

The current EFRR guidelines’ indirect-cost catalogue includes a project coordinator and other staff engaged in project management, settlement, project monitoring or administration, management staff, support/administrative/legal staff and accounting; this call’s own RWP fixes indirect costs at 0.5% of eligible direct costs, so these are cost components of that common flat-rate pool rather than separately reimbursed salaries.

Koszt kwalifikowalny

Direct costs qualify only when they meet the 2021–2027 expenditure-eligibility guidelines and the current SZOP; call-specific and catalogue exclusions still apply.

Limit kosztu kwalifikowalnego

0,5 eligible_direct_costs

Fixed 0.5% flat-rate pool applied to all eligible direct costs. This is an overhead settlement rule, not a staff salary or service-rate benchmark. Direct costs subject to public aid/de minimis have specific aid-treatment conditions in RWP §8.5.4; applicant-specific aid treatment is not resolved here.

Intensywność wsparcia, maksimum

85

Maximum EFRR share and maximum total public co-financing are each 85% of eligible expenditure under the stated SZOP limits. Footnotes say the funding agreement may contain a departure; no project-specific exception is assumed.

Koszt niekwalifikowalny

The catalogue lists direct costs for the beneficiary’s or its employees’ own-performance remuneration and project-management services (beneficiary obligations to the institution, procurement, routine project operation, settlement and outcome monitoring) as ineligible. These direct-cost exclusions are distinct from the separately limited flat-rate indirect personnel pool.

Koszt niekwalifikowalny

For type IV public-space monitoring activities, costs of remuneration for persons/services monitoring public space and equipment directly unrelated to the monitoring system are expressly ineligible. This does not state that all project monitoring, all project personnel, or all other project activity wages are prohibited.

Wkład własny, minimum

15

Minimum own contribution stated for the beneficiary; funding agreement may contain departures from the §7.1–7.2 maximum percentages, as indicated in their footnotes.

Koszt projektu, minimum

1 000 000 zł

Minimum eligible expenditure for the project is PLN 1,000,000. This is an eligible-cost floor, not a grant minimum or total-project-value floor.

• Zarządzanie projektem

  Koszt personelu, który grant może sfinansować

  Cost treatment is only through the fixed 0.5% flat-rate indirect-cost pool of eligible direct expenditure, subject to the application-specific aid classification and grant agreement. This category does not establish separate salary reimbursement, salary rate, named roles, required hiring, headcount, FTE, duration or qualifications. Distinguish project-level monitoring/admin functions in the indirect-cost list from personnel/services monitoring public space, whose remuneration is expressly excluded for Type IV.

• RW_2 Instrukcja wypełniania wniosku; Annex ZIP member, call FEPK.06.01-IZ.00-031/26

  funduszeunijne.gov.pl

• Wytyczne dotyczące kwalifikowalności wydatków 2021–2027, effective 25 May 2026

  funduszeeuropejskie.gov.pl

• Regulamin wyboru projektów, FEPK.06.01-IZ.00-031/26, adopted 1 September 2026

  funduszeunijne.gov.pl

• Official central portal call page: FEPK.06.01-IZ.00-031/26

  funduszeunijne.gov.pl

Otwarcie

10 wrz 2026

Instytucja

FE dla Podkarpacia

Źródło

funduszeunijne.gov.pl

Sprawdzono

23 paź 2026

Status przeglądu

Przegląd częściowy

Przejrzano

23 paź 2026